Manchester · Visa agency
R&A Solicitors (Manchester)
Law firm on Cheetham Hill Road in Manchester whose immigration team prepares UK visit and student visa applications, alongside conveyancing and personal injury work.
Facts from the agency's website
- Name
- R&A Solicitors
- Address
- 366 Cheetham Hill Road, Manchester M8 9LS
- City
Manchester, United Kingdom
- Phone
- +44 161 721 4545
- info@rasolicitors.co.uk
- Services it lists
- UK visit visa applications · Student visa applications · Corporate immigration · Conveyancing · Personal injury
- Destinations
- United Kingdom
- Website
- rasolicitors.co.uk
- Last checked
- 3 Nov 2026
- Our checks
4 of 5 checks
- ✓Website is live and names the businessrasolicitors.co.uk · opened 1 Nov 2026
- ✓Address on its own website366 Cheetham Hill Road, Manchester M8 9LS
- ✓Phone on its own website+44 161 721 4545
- –Prices published, with a dateNot checked yet
- ✓Checked in the last 90 daysLast checked 3 Nov 2026
Sources. We took these facts from the agency's own pages.
- rasolicitors.co.uk · opened 1 Nov 2026“366 Cheetham Hill Road Manchester M8 9LS”
Reviews from our users
No reviews yet. Be the first to review R&A Solicitors.
Before you pay
- For UK immigration advice, check the adviser in the IAA Adviser Register yourself, by name or IAA number; solicitors are on the SRA's or a law society's register.
- Ask for a written quote that shows the official visa fee and the agency's own fee separately.
- No agency can guarantee a visa. Treat “guaranteed approval” as a red flag.
- Pay to an account in the company's name and keep the receipt.
- A visit visa doesn't let you work. A job offer that comes with a visit visa is a common scam.
Other agencies nearby or for the same visas
Write a review
Used R&A Solicitors? Tell others what went well or badly. An editor reads every review before it appears; we don't publish your email.
Last checked 3 Nov 2026. Change log, newest first: 3 Nov 2026: re-checked against its website; 1 Nov 2026: 6 quotes read on its website, from 1 page. Something wrong or out of date? Report a change.